Why the Ebola outbreak is worrying public health officials

The ongoing Ebola surge has public health experts anxious about the world's capacity to contain its spread. The big picture: Ebola epidemics aren't new, but the current outbreak has been identified as the rare Bundibugyo strain, which has no vaccine, and is located in a populated, mobile and conflict-stricken part of the world. Thirty cases have been confirmed in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), while two confirmed cases, including one death, have been recorded in Uganda from people who traveled from the DRC, WHO Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said Monday. There are more than 500 suspected cases and 130 suspected deaths, he said. One American working in the DRC tested positive and is being taken to Germany for treatment, the CDC confirmed Monday. The World Health Organization has deemed the outbreak a public health emergency of international concern . Context: Nasia Safdar, an infectious diseases physician and professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, tells Axios that Ebola concerns her more than the recent hantavirus outbreak, noting the cruise ship environment where it spread is very different than the outside world. Only one hantavirus strain is known to spread human-to-human, but four Ebola strains cause illnesses in people, per the CDC. Hantavirus rarely spreads among people, but public health experts pointed to the recent outbreak as evidence that more research is needed into its spread. Once spillover to humans occurs, the Ebola virus is challenging to contain and regularly leads to the most life-threatening cases of viral hemorrhagic fevers. A 2014-2016 surge in West Africa infected more than 28,600 people and killed 11,325, per the WHO. The fatality rates in the past two Ebola outbreaks have ranged from 30-50%. What they're saying: This particular Ebola outbreak is troubling, says Jennifer Nuzzo, the director of the Pandemic Center at Brown University School of Public Health. "Many peop...

Original source: Axios